Development Workflow Process#
This guide is intended for people are already familiar with contributing to open source projects on GitHub. If you are new to GitHub, read the Setup Development Environment guide first.
Checklist for Contributions#
Here’s a checklist of things that need to be done when making a pull request to SymPy. These things all need to be done before a pull request is merged. It is not necessary to do all of them before the pull request is opened at all, but it is often a good idea to check the basic things first before opening a pull request, or even before committing a change.
Make sure code quality checks pass.
./bin/test quality flake8 sympy/
Add tests. All new functionality should be tested. Bug fixes should add regression tests. Tests are written in pytest
assert f(x) == ystyle and are included in corresponding
testsdirectories in the
sympy/source. See the guide on writing tests.
New public functions and methods should have a docstring.
Docstrings should include doctests.
Make sure all tests pass. You may want to run a relevant subset of the test suite locally before committing (e.g.,
./bin/test solvers). When you open a pull request, all tests will be run on CI. The CI must be all green before a PR can be merged.
(First time contributors only) Add your name to the
.mailmapfile. The “test / authors” CI build on GitHub will fail if this is not done correctly.
Cross reference relevant issues in the pull request description. If the pull request fixes an issue (i.e., the issue should be closed once the PR is merged), use the “fixes #123” syntax .
Add a comment to the original issue cross-referencing the pull request for visibility. If there is not a corresponding issue, this is OK. It is not necessary to open an issue unless there are further improvements needed beyond your PR.
Add a release notes entry. This should be done when opening the pull request, in the pull request description field. It can be edited at any time before the pull request is merged.
Respond to review comments. All SymPy pull requests must be reviewed by someone else before they can be merged.
Pick an issue to fix#
The best way to start with the main code base is to fix some existing bugs. Peruse the “Easy to fix” issues in the issue tracker and see if one interests you. If you’d like to try to fix it, then create a message in the issue saying that you’d like to work on it. If it isn’t clear how to fix it, ask for suggestions on how to do it in the issue itself or on the mailing list.
SymPy’s code is organized into Python packages and modules. The core code is
sympy/core directory and other packages in the sympy directory have
more specific code. For example,
sympy/printing contains the code that
handles how SymPy objects are printed to the terminal and Jupyter.
If you are making a change that does not yet have an issue, it is not required to open an issue first. This is only necessary if you feel you want to discuss the change before you make a pull request, for example, if you’re not sure if something is actually a bug, or if you’re not sure if a new feature is in scope. It’s also fine to just open a pull request and discuss it there. Discussions are easier to have when there is actual code to talk about, so a pull request is preferable if you have changes, even if they aren’t fully ready to merge yet.
Create a new branch#
The first thing to do before making changes to the code is to make a branch in git.
Remember, never commit to
master should only be used to pull
in upstream changes from the main sympy/sympy repo. If you commit to
it will be difficult to pull these changes in, and it will also be difficult
if you wish to make more than one pull request at a time.
First pick a name for your branch. See Branch names below. To create and checkout (that is, make it the working branch) a new branch run
# Pull any upstream changes from the main SymPy repo first git checkout master git pull git branch <your-branch-name> git checkout <your-branch-name>
The last two commands can also be combined into a single command:
git checkout -b <your-branch-name>
To view all branches, with your current branch highlighted, type:
And remember, never type the following commands in master:
git rebase. If you made some commits to your local
master by accident, you will have to hard reset to drop the commits.
Use a short, easy to type branch name that somehow relates to the changes. Remember that developers who wish to try out your code will need to type your branch name in the command line to do so.
Avoid using issue numbers in branch names as these are not easy to type (most SymPy issue numbers are 5 digits long) and they won’t really be indicative of what the change is about without looking up the issue.
Some examples of good branch names are
fix-solve-bug typo-fix core-improvements add-simplify-tests
Ultimately the branch name is not that important, so don’t spend too much time thinking about it. It’s only function is to distinguish the code for this contribution from other contributions you may make.
When making your fix, keep in mind there are several requirements that every contribution should follow:
SymPy contributions must have sufficient code quality to be accepted. There are some code quality checks that will run automatically on the CI once you create a pull request, but you can also run them locally with
./bin/test quality flake8 sympy/
Additionally, all tests are required to pass. The CI will automatically run the tests, but you can also run them yourself. It is recommended to run at least the tests that relate to the code you modified before committing to ensure you did not make any mistakes or accidentally break something.
Once you submit your pull request, you should check the GitHub Actions checks once they complete to see if there are any test failures. If there are, you will need to fix them before the pull request will be accepted.
All new functionality should be tested. If you are fixing a bug, it should be accompanied with a regression test. That is, a test that would fail before the bug fix but now passes. Often you can use a code example from an issue as a test case, although it is also OK to simplify such examples or to write your own, so long as it tests the issue in question.
Tests are located alongside the code in
tests/ directories, in files named
test_<thing>.py. In most cases, if you modified
sympy/<submodule>/<file>.py then the test for the functionality will go in
sympy/<submodule>/tests/test_<file>.py. For example, the tests for the
sympy/simplify/sqrtdenest.py are in
sympy/simplify/tests/test_sqrtdenest.py. There are some exceptions to this
rule so in general try to find where the existing tests are for a function and
add your tests alongside them.
Tests follow a simple pattern, which should be apparent from reading the
existing test files. Tests are in functions that start with
contain lines like
assert function(arguments) == result
# from sympy/functions/elementary/tests/test_trigonometric.py def test_cos_series(): assert cos(x).series(x, 0, 9) == \ 1 - x**2/2 + x**4/24 - x**6/720 + x**8/40320 + O(x**9)
New test cases can be added to an existing test function if it is relevant, or you can create a new test function.
All new methods, functions, and classes should have a docstring showing how to
use them. A docstring is a triple quoted string that goes right after the
def line that describes the function. Docstrings should follow the format as
outlined in the SymPy Docstrings Style Guide.
One important thing that should be included in every docstring is examples.
Examples are also called doctests, because they are tested with the
bin/doctest script to ensure they output is correct.
Doctests need to include imports for every function used define any symbols
that are used. Users should be able to copy and paste the example inputs into
their own Python session and get the exact same outputs.
from sympy import *
is not allowed in doctests, as this would make it unclear which functions come
The docstring style guide has more details on how to format examples in docstrings.
Keep in mind, doctests are not tests. Think of them as examples that happen to be tested. Some key differences:
write doctests to be informative; write regular tests to check for regressions and corner cases.
doctests can be changed at any time; regular tests should not be changed.
In particular, we should be able to change or delete any doctest at any time if it makes the docstring better to understand.
Here is an example docstring with doctests (from
def fdiff(self, argindex=1): """ Returns the first derivative of a Heaviside Function. Examples ======== >>> from sympy import Heaviside, diff >>> from sympy.abc import x >>> Heaviside(x).fdiff() DiracDelta(x) >>> Heaviside(x**2 - 1).fdiff() DiracDelta(x**2 - 1) >>> diff(Heaviside(x)).fdiff() DiracDelta(x, 1) """ if argindex == 1: return DiracDelta(self.args) else: raise ArgumentIndexError(self, argindex)
Additionally, all public function docstrings should be included in the Sphinx
API documentation. Depending on the module, this may mean you need to add an
.. autofunction:: line to the corresponding
file. You should build the documentation and look
at it to ensure there are no markup errors in the rendered HTML.
If you want to write a more long-form guide or tutorial, you may include this in the Sphinx documentation as a Markdown or RST file instead of putting it in a docstring. While this is not a requirement for new contributions, we are always looking to add new well-written long-form guides to our documentation.
Once you have made a pull request on GitHub, the CI will automatically build a preview of the documentation that you can view. On the pull request page, scroll to the bottom where the checks are, and find the link that says “Click here to see a preview of the documentation.”
Run the Tests#
There are several ways of running SymPy tests but the easiest is to use the
The script takes a number of options and arguments. Run
bin/test --help for
all supported arguments. Under the hood it uses
pytest, and you can use that
directly as well if you prefer.
Run all tests by using the command:
To run tests for a specific file, use:
$ ./bin/test test_basic
test_basic is from file
To run tests for modules, use:
$ ./bin/test /core /utilities
This will run tests for the
Similary, run quality tests with:
$ ./bin/test code_quality
Commit the changes#
Once the changes are ready, you should commit them. You can check what files are changed:
Check total changes:
If you created any new files, add them with:
git add new_file.py
You are ready to commit changes locally. A commit also contains a
commit message which describes it. See the next section for guidelines on writing
good commit messages. Type:
An editor window will appear automatically in this case. In Linux, this is vim
by default. You can change what editor pops up by changing the
Also with the help of option
-a you can tell the command
automatically stage files that have been modified and deleted, but new files
you have not told git about will not be affected, e.g.,:
git commit -a
If you want to stage only part of your changes, you can use the interactive commit feature. Just type:
git commit --interactive
and choose the changes you want in the resulting interface.
Deleting junk files#
A lot of editors can create some configuration files, binary files, or temporary files in your SymPy directory, which should be removed before merging your commits.
Tracking down individual files can be cumbersome.
You may think of using
.gitignore, however, editing the
would have the agreement from the community.
.git/info/exclude would be the best, because it is only applied locally.
Writing commit messages#
The commit message has two parts: a title (first line) and the body. The two are separated by a blank line.
Commit messages summarize what the commit does. Just as with the code, your commit messages will become a permanent part of the project git history. So you should put some effort into making them high quality. Commit messages are intended for human readers, both for people who will be reviewing your code right now, and for people who might come across your commit in the future while researching some change in the code. Thus, include information that helps others understand your commit here, if necessary.
git shortlog and the GitHub UI only show the first line of the
commit by default, so it is important to convey the most important aspects of
the commit in the first line.
Keep the first line 71 characters or less and subsequent lines to 78 characters or less. This allows the one-line form of the log to display the summary without wrapping.
Make sure to leave a blank line after the summary
Do not end the first line with a period (full stop). Subsequent lines should use periods.
Provide context for the commit if possible,
integrals: Improved speed of heurisch()instead of just
Improved speed of heurisch()
Reference any relevant issue numbers. You do not need to reference the pull request for the change itself, but issues that are fixed should be referenced either by
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/12345. You should also provide a brief summary of an issue rather than just referring to the issue number so that people don’t have to look around for context.
A commit won’t always be seen in the context of your branch, so it is often helpful to give each commit some context. This is not required, though, as it is not hard to look at the commit metadata to see what files were modified or at the commit history to see the nearby related commits.
Use plain English. Write in complete sentences.
Describe what actually changed. Don’t just write something like
Modified solvers.py. People can already see what files are modified from the commit diff. What the message is there for is to tell them what the diff actually does, so they don’t have to try to figure it out. Similarly, although relevant issues should be cross-referenced as noted above, the message should contain enough of a basic summary that people can understand what is going on without having to look up the issue. The issue can provide more detailed context for people who are interested.
Try to avoid short commit messages, like “Fix”, and commit messages that give no context, like “Found the bug”. When in doubt, a longer commit message is probably better than a short one. Avoid using the
git committo write a commit message on the command line. Rather, let it open your editor so you can write a longer commit message.
Give an overview of what the commit does if it is difficult to figure out just from looking at the diff.
Include other relevant information, e.g.
A concrete example (for commits that add new features/improve performance etc.)
Use bullet lists when suitable
Feel free to use Unicode characters, such as output from the SymPy Unicode pretty printer.
Example of a good commit message#
Here is an example commit message from the commit bf0e81e12a2f75711c30f0788daf4e58f72b2a41, which is part of the SymPy history:
integrals: Improved speed of heurisch() and revised tests Improved speed of anti-derivative candidate expansion and solution phases using explicit domains and solve_lin_sys(). The upside of this change is that large integrals (those that generate lots of monomials) are now computed *much* faster. The downside is that integrals involving Derivative() don't work anymore. I'm not sure if they really used to work properly or it was just a coincidence and/or bad implementation. This needs further investigation. Example: In : from sympy.integrals.heurisch import heurisch In : f = (1 + x + x*exp(x))*(x + log(x) + exp(x) - 1)/(x + log(x) + exp(x))**2/x In : %time ratsimp(heurisch(f, x)) CPU times: user 7.27 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 7.31 s Wall time: 7.32 s Out: ⎛ 2 x 2⋅x x 2 ⎞ log⎝x + 2⋅x⋅ℯ + 2⋅x⋅log(x) + ℯ + 2⋅ℯ ⋅log(x) + log (x)⎠ 1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── + ─────────────── 2 x x + ℯ + log(x) Previously it took 450 seconds and 4 GB of RAM to compute.
Make a Pull Request#
Once your changes are ready for review, push them up to GitHub, and make a pull request.
It is also OK to make a pull request before the changes are completely ready, to get some early feedback. It is better to get feedback early before you spend too much time on it. If your pull request is not completely ready for merging, open it in the “DRAFT” state on GitHub. You can also add “[WIP]” (which stands for “work in progress”) to the beginning of the pull request title to indicate this. Just be sure to remove the DRAFT state or [WIP] when your PR is ready for final review.
Writing pull request title and description#
When you make a pull request, be sure to fill out the pull request description template. This includes adding cross-references to any relevant issues (with “fixes” if appropriate), and adding a release notes entry.
Descriptive titles are very important. The pull request title should indicate what is fixed. Pull requests with undescriptive titles will tend to be ignored by reviewers.
Examples of bad pull request titles are
“Fix issue #12345”
These do indicate to reviewers what is actually changed in the pull request, and hence, they are likely to just pass it over instead of reviewing it. An example of a better pull request title is
“Fix a bug with solve() on transcendental functions”
Do not put issue numbers or file names in the pull request title. Issue numbers should go in the description.
Use the DRAFT status or include the prefix “[WIP]” in the title if you aren’t ready to have the pull request merged and remove the status/prefix when you are ready.
The description is a good place to:
Show what you have done, perhaps comparing output from master with the output after your changes
Refer to the issue that was addressed like “#1234”; that format will automatically create a link to the corresponding issue or pull request, e.g. “This is similar to the problem in issue #1234…”. This format also works in the discussion section of the pull request.
Use phrases like “closes #1234” or “fixed #1234” (or similar that follow the auto-close syntax and are also discussed here). Then those other issues or pull requests will be closed automatically when your pull request is merged. Note: this syntax does not work in the discussion of the pull request. See this quick guide for the valid and invalid syntax for automatically closing issues from pull requests.
the pull request needs a release notes entry. See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Writing-Release-Notes on how to write release notes in the pull request description. The SymPy Bot will check that your PR has release notes automatically.
It is best to just fill out the pull request template (the text that is there when you open a pull request). If you fill out all the sections in the template, you will have a good pull request description.
Add your name and email address to the .mailmap file.#
Every author’s name and email address is stored in the AUTHORS file, but this file should not be edited directly. The AUTHORS file is updated automatically when a new version of SymPy is released based on the name and email addresses that are recorded in the commits. Every commit made with git stores the name and email address that git is configured with (see “Configure git settings” above). The .mailmap file is used to associate the name/email recorded in the commits with an author name and email address that will be listed in the AUTHORS file.
The first time you make a pull request you will need to add your name and email address to the .mailmap file by adding a line like
Joe Bloggs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This name and email should exactly match the name and email that you have configured with git before making the commits (see “Configure git settings” above). The
bin/mailmap_check.py script can check that this has been done correctly. If you have made a commit but not yet added yourself to the .mailmap file then you will see this:
$ python bin/mailmap_check.py This author is not included in the .mailmap file: Joe Bloggs <email@example.com> The .mailmap file needs to be updated because there are commits with unrecognised author/email metadata. For instructions on updating the .mailmap file see: https://docs.sympy.org/dev/contributing/new-contributors-guide/workflow-process.html#mailmap-instructions The following authors will be added to the AUTHORS file at the time of the next SymPy release.
This means that you should add your name and email address to the .mailmap file. If you add this at the end of the file then
git diff will show:
$ git diff diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap index 3af6dc1..7fa63b1 100644 --- a/.mailmap +++ b/.mailmap @@ -1307,3 +1307,4 @@ zsc347 <firstname.lastname@example.org> Øyvind Jensen <email@example.com> Łukasz Pankowski <firstname.lastname@example.org> 彭于斌 <email@example.com> +Joe Bloggs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Now you can rerun the
bin/mailmap_check.py script and you should see:
$ python bin/mailmap_check.py The mailmap file was reordered For instructions on updating the .mailmap file see: https://docs.sympy.org/dev/contributing/new-contributors-guide/workflow-process.html#mailmap-instructions The following authors will be added to the AUTHORS file at the time of the next SymPy release. Joe Bloggs <email@example.com>
The first line their says that the .mailmap file was “reordered”. This is because the file should be in alphabetical order. The script will have moved your name into the correct position so now you can see the change as:
$ git diff diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap index 3af6dc1..7598d94 100644 --- a/.mailmap +++ b/.mailmap @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ Joannah Nanjekye <firstname.lastname@example.org> Joannah Nanjekye <email@example.com Joannah Nanjekye <firstname.lastname@example.org> nanjekyejoannah <email@example.com> Joaquim Monserrat <firstname.lastname@example.org> Jochen Voss <email@example.com> +Joe Bloggs <firstname.lastname@example.org> Jogi Miglani <email@example.com> jmig5776 <firstname.lastname@example.org> Johan Blåbäck <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> Johan Guzman <email@example.com>
Now if you rerun the script you will see:
$ python bin/mailmap_check.py No changes needed in .mailmap The following authors will be added to the AUTHORS file at the time of the next SymPy release. Joe Bloggs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The key information here is “No changes needed in .mailmap” which means that you have correctly updated the .mailmap file. You should now add and commit these changes as well:
git add .mailmap git commit -m 'author: add Joe Bloggs to .mailmap'
Sometimes a commit will be made with an incorrect name or email address or an author will make multiple commits with different names and email addresses. In this case a line should be added to the .mailmap file where the first name and email address is what should be recorded in the AUTHORS file and the others are the name and email address that was incorrectly used in the other commits. For example if the commit was recorded with the name
joeb and the email address
email@example.com but the AUTHORS file should show
Joe Bloggs as above then there should be a line in the .mailmap file like:
Joe Bloggs <firstname.lastname@example.org> joeb <email@example.com>
A common reason that this can happen is if making commits with the GitHub web UI which always recorded the name as github username and the email as something like
firstname.lastname@example.org. In this case a line will need to be added to .mailmap like:
Joe Bloggs <email@example.com> joeb <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Multiple lines like this can be added to the .mailmap file. They should record all of the different name and email address combinations that have been used by an author and map all of them to a single author name that will show in the AUTHORS file.
If your pull request is merged and you have not previously been added to the AUTHORS file then your name will be added at the time of the next release of SymPy.